@schema86 Honestly, nobody cares, including Ubi. The game has always required you to be online to play, and is advertised as such, and all the paid content has been well documented for more than a year (all content added since Sept 2020, has been free). So if you were silly enough to buy three copies before even trying the game, then that's on you, not Ubi.

@aex_khves I agree that the game needs at least one more update, but it needs to include bigger things than just some UI improvements. Such as finishing off the map, the promised next gen upgrades and finally finishing off all the possible gunsmith updates.

@fcac-no-moe To be fair, it's a lot easier to code AI for a linear game, like F.E.A.R and Future Soldier, because most of their actions are scripted. The problem with linear games though, is they get boring very fast. Where as open world games, you can spend days just messing around, clearing bases using new weapons and tactics. . I have well over 3000 hours invested between Wildlands and Breakpoint. I can't imagine even spending 100+ hours replaying the GRAW or Future Soldier campaigns

@cwavvyyy No, just No! The vast majority of fans want there to be less science fiction crap, not more.

@Snakeeater49910 Chill out buddy. He didn't bash the content of your post, just the lack of proper structure. I tried reading it, but gave up after losing my place several times. So all he's saying is, if it was broken down into smaller paragraphs, it would make it easier for the reader

@ltjasonwolfe The vast majority of feedback has asked for less of the science fiction crap, and thankfully they have listened. If you want to play as a cyborg, go try Crysis 3, or maybe Outriders.

@eagle-eyezx

I agree with a lot of what you saying, except that they should stop supporting this game. No longer adding content to Breakpoint is not going to make development of the next game faster. All that would do is allow players to get bored and move onto other games But supporting Breakpoint could make the next game better, because they can use it to trial run mechanics, to see how they work out in the wild. For example, changing the camouflage the enemies use based on the environment, might have been something they were developing for the next game. But instead of waiting until the next game releases to see if it causes any issues (winter camo in the forest as an example), they could add it to Op Motherland. Then they get to see whether or not the community appreciates that kind of detail (which we do), but they can see how well it works when not in a controlled setting, such as a test server.

@vaessili_fr I like the idea of the next TU having a Ukranian MTX pack, where any proceeds are donated to assist Ukrainian refugees. It could include the Ukraine flag patch, and their camo pattern. As far as I can tell from pictures, their special forces use a mix of Western and Russian gear, that's pretty much already in the game.

@DanHibikiFanXM

@cwavvyyy I personally don't want the game to force you into 1st person again. But maybe they could add the option in the settings, or make it similar to when you're aiming, where you're able to switch between 1st and 3rd person on the fly.

@Kean_1 That's good to know. I'm sure there'll me a large modding community as well, but I've always been hesitant about using mods, since you never know what mods could get you banned, or break the game.

@FcAc-No-Moe maybe theres' two different ADS modes, like in GB? One where you look through the sight, and one where you look over the sight, which is better while using NODs. The game looks good, but I wish you were playing as a Marine Raider or Force Recon, because as a basic infantryman, you're limited in what gear and weapons you're allowed to use.

Megalodon26 #3966

All I can say is, Thank God for Reddit. It was already my preferred spot for discussing the game, since it's far more user friendly, and a much larger number of active users.

@Zensp00n You are entitled to your opinion, but there were much more important things to fix in the game, than the movement system. Besides, I'm not even sure if the movement could be changed post launch, without a complete overhaul, which they weren't going to do. Sure they were able to speed up some animations, but that's more just tweaking some numbers in the code.

Hey, if it means that we will stop hearing the NPC's say the same 10-15 lines, over and over again, I'm all for it. Hell, even if they use it to script the cut scenes, it can't do much worse than some of the cringe dialogue in Breakpoint.

@AI-BLUEFOX I mean they already have enemy AI that drive a preset path, including at speed, that react to obstacles in the road. So it should be possible to have the friendly AI that can drive or fly using a waypoint system. After all, they had AI capable of driving from point A to point B, on command, in other games. Games like LA Niore, Grand theft Auto had Ai that could drive and follow traffic, and in Far Cry the AI companions could both drive and fly. Even in the recent Assassins Creed games, you can have your mount or ship follow the roads and rivers to the selected destination, on their own.

@GiveMeTactical I never said that you didn't have a right to your opinion. I just don't understand why someone would keep coming to the forums, just to be negative. It just seems like a complete waste of time to me, and I'm retired.

@Mars388502 and @GiveMeTactical. I have no problem if someone has issues with the direction Ubi has taken the series, or the lack of transparency, because I've had issues with it as well. But in spite of all my frustrations, I still have hope that Ubi can see the light, and make a proper Ghost Recon experience using all the feedback that we've been giving them. But if you don't think that is even possible, and only focus on the negative aspects of the last few games, you walk a fine line between being a critic and being a troll.

@GiveMeTactical See, this is what I don't understand about some people. you say that you didn't like the last few games, and you don't have any faith that the studio is even capable of making a game that you will like, so why keep coming to the forums? I lost faith in R6 years ago, after they cancelled Patriots. But you're never going to find me on those forums, let alone almost daily, trashing Siege and Quarantine to the current group of players. I did what my father used to do as a Combat Engineer. I built a bridge and I got over it.