@muricaz
This is a big glitch if you lost gained progress.
When we pay more than 100€ for game there should be quick fixes, daily patches and support from devs.
If I buy indie game for 2€ than let me wait a month for some fix, I understand. But not here.

@quor321 Please, stop believe in fairy tales.
Big company will never go on such risk to make game that lose money and hoping it will bring profit from microtransactions. If the game will be bad, then there will be no microtransactions and they could go down with such game. You are very far away from true, which may surprise you.
Yes, cost of making AAA game is high, but it is nicely covered by good sales. Games are sell now more than ever - maybe if you just watch some news, read some reports, you will not live in a bubble where you believe what companies selling microtransactions tells you. Just read some profit charts of companies. If game is good, sells good, than it bring enough to cover costs and bring profits to make shareholders happy and allow company to go forward and make another game. Microtransactions is just greed that even Scrooge will be ashamed of. I really don´t understand how can someone believe it. And it is just a matter of faith. If you read articles, check google, wikipedia, you will know it is no true. Even other companies which don´t do it have profit, which is another proof. This is really unbelievable.

@quor321 It is your right to not believe what you read. But if you don´t have enough facts, you shouldn´t be protecting company in duscussion based on guesses. If we don´t believe anything, then there is no point in discussing anything. And from many topics is clear that mostly are in favor of corporations people who really don´t know how market works and believe what corporation said, or people who are paid by corporation. Because we don´t talk here about some reptilian conspiracy, but about common facts of business, market, revenue and costs. And even companies alone state their yearly profits and many times they celebrate and let know to the world how good the year was for them. Some even go to the limit like Activision, when they announce that they have biggest profit in history and then they fire 800 emplyees. While CDPR paid bonuses regardless of launch problems.
Ubisoft made great games, but over the years they fall into stereotype of copying their own games. And they arent EA, Activision, or Blizzard, they don´t neglect their fans like Bethesda, but they aren´t far away from it and proudly marching towards those toxic companies.

@quor321 Please, stop believe in fairy tales.
Big company will never go on such risk to make game that lose money and hoping it will bring profit from microtransactions. If the game will be bad, then there will be no microtransactions and they could go down with such game. You are very far away from true, which may surprise you.
Yes, cost of making AAA game is high, but it is nicely covered by good sales. Games are sell now more than ever - maybe if you just watch some news, read some reports, you will not live in a bubble where you believe what companies selling microtransactions tells you. Just read some profit charts of companies. If game is good, sells good, than it bring enough to cover costs and bring profits to make shareholders happy and allow company to go forward and make another game. Microtransactions is just greed that even Scrooge will be ashamed of. I really don´t understand how can someone believe it. And it is just a matter of faith. If you read articles, check google, wikipedia, you will know it is no true. Even other companies which don´t do it have profit, which is another proof. This is really unbelievable.

@dreadgrrl Yes, but shareholders can decided what they want, if customers were allied.
But sadly it will not happened. Unless they torture a cat, or fire someone on the base of heir race, nothing will changed. Free market isn´t that free if customers behave like sheeps. IF there will be loud voice of criticism, then shareholders will notice. But without it they will not notice, since they sold their souls and they aren´t ashamed of anything.

@dreadgrrl OK, I don´t know where you live, but it was just an example. Whether it is president, or anything else - you can act as nothing happened and let it be, or try to change it - if you want something like live in country, play a good game, eat a good food and if you do something for it like pay taxes, pay for game, pay for food. I think you get it, you just don´t want to acknowedge it.

@dreadgrrl Things are working very well for them. People still prefer them. You know you have drak side with EA (Evil Actually) and light side where was CDPR. Yes, they messed up. Very much. But they are still far better than EA, or similar companies. And Ubisoft walking slowly, but systematicly and continuously over the years towards EA system.
But true is, that whole state of AAA game companies is very bed, when CDPR even after they mess are still best example of customer friendly company.

@quor321 I play it because I am completionist. It is much worse than Origin, or Odyssey. But it has nothing to do with what we are talking about. Even if it will be game for 7 hours which I like and fihish 100 times, it doesn´t chane the fact that this is simply wrong. Whether I enjoy it, or not, whether I play it for long time, or not - it doesn´t change fact that season pass should give you everything. I don´t want something for nothing. I just want it worth overpriced price that I pay.

@dreadgrrl Such a nonsensical argument. If you don´t like pracitce of corporation, then buy from indie developers. Wake up. You can said if you don´t like presidnet, move to another country - intead of voting for other candidate. Stick you head to the sand will never solve anything. Maybe you just don´t know that there are companies who don´t make such practices.

@leoraptor1979 You are very young, or very naive if you believ that microtransactions is necessary for company to survive.
And this is DLC, not microtransaticon. Premium starte pack DLC.
Why would I cry? You don´t complain if you are victim of shady practice? Maybe not, maybe you believe that they need to do it to survive and that santa will bring you presents.

@asgardian02 Because it is stated as DLC. And common decency is that season pass will give you all dlc.
Yes, it is not legally binding. Same thing did Square Enix with Tomb Raider. One thing is greed and technically "not part of this, or that" and one thing is be fair to paying customers. 110 € is really too much money for this, for what we get. Yes, for management who count millions it is not even pocket change, but if you take customer seriously, you know it is lot of money and that you can´t treat customer as a milking cow.

Dear developers and managers,
is greed all you know? Do you not feel ashamed? When I buy Ultimate edition for 110€ and then you put there DLC which isn´t available for me, it si simply dishonest policy. Your helix shop is also deep hit, but it is something like loophole, so we accepted that your greed can be satisfied there. But this is simply uncacceptable.
Reducing sidequests, making building village less interesting than building settlment in AC3, all that steps back, asking 110€ for ultimate and then you have audacity to sell separate DLC?
This is reason why people can forgive CDPR even such mess lauch, as they had. They don´t treat us like idiots who will buy anything.