So I don’t know if I’m missing something but I’m new to siege and want to clarify something. This is my second season of rank which I started with my friend. We’ve played every single game together and somehow he is in plat and I’m still in bronze. Every game I win, I only get 30 MMR and he gets 70+. I’m not the best but I just ran a game by myself, went 9-0, and won 4-0 as mvp, yet I still only got 30 MMR. Am I missing something that’s making me get less or….?

In the game, like CAPITAO, his skills and equipment are very good, but his PARA-308 play change makes people feel very uncomfortable, feeling that the play change is not smooth and the play change time is long, but in fact, his play change time is not too much different from others, but the sound effects and actions of the play change make people feel very uncomfortable. Therefore, it may be necessary to optimize the staff who have similar issues with ammunition replacement to give players a good experience.
In terms of skills, such as GRIM skills, they feel very uncomfortable when cutting guns, and they feel very fluid when using skills. Perhaps they can be changed to resemble Sophia, which may provide a better experience. Staff with similar problems also need improvement.

GRIM currently appears to be performing mediocrely, first, the use of skills is not very comfortable, and second, skills do not have outstanding characteristics. Perhaps making his skill more like ZOFIA's shock grenade, after hitting the skill, it will sense a person to automatically explode, and then the bees will mark the enemy. Of course, the original skill can also be retained to block the area. You can use "B" to switch between the two modes.
TACHANKA's appearance and victory rates are truly appalling. His skills are very prone to errors when used, as they can be ejected once, making it easy for players to make mistakes when using them in a panic. If his skill can be adjusted in mode, one is that it can be catapulted once now, and the other is that it can explode instantly, improving the flexibility of using the skill. And whether the DP27 can give 1.5 times the mirror. This gun cannot hit the enemy at a long distance, nor can it hit the enemy at close range. It is a very difficult weapon to use.

Secondary equipment is very important for agents. Having secondary equipment suitable for different agents can make some agents very strong, but these also make it impossible for some agents to have secondary equipment to assist their skills. In leisure mode, there may sometimes be situations where three or four people do not carry missiles, which is not beneficial for attacking attackers. Perhaps the game can make a very bold change - allowing all agents to choose any one of the props! This can allow each agent to have equipment suitable for themselves, but some people may say that there is a problem of selecting 5 people to choose both grenades or c4, but it may be possible to limit the number of selections for each secondary item in the game, such as only 2 items can be selected for each secondary item, such as only 2 people with grenades for 5 people, or only 1 item can be selected. This can limit the number of secondary items that can appear, such as grenades, and also allow agents to have equipment that suits them. It can allow some secondary equipment to have a certain selection rate, reflecting the value of secondary items, and can make the game full of uncertainty, because you don't know which secondary equipment was selected by the opposite agent!
In fact, you can also try to experiment with it as an arcade mode, and it's okay to test its feasibility.

Ranked is so bad after the new system. I can't seem to get lobbies that aren't filled with champions (I was emerald 1 last season). It's so stupid that I have to play with them considering I can't get more than 4 kills in a match this season, I averaged 6 to 8 kills last season. I don't see why ranked 2.0 was ever needed.

Hi Ubisoft,

Please add an update to allow squad or at leaet two players in shooting range.

I train friends and would like to see how they shoot and how they can improve. Please also disable friendly fire in shooting range.

Thanks.

I would just like to ask y’all to please update the mp5 damage to higher number the gun is so bad now it feels like it just never does enough damage to kill anybody. Thank you

in all the beta ranks that the developer has made, it is always a straight line in the tug-of-war style, a plastered system with no movement between the medals, and the absence of movement kills the sporting spirit of the players, who, when they become aware that it is independent of their strength of will, victory and defeat belong to the work of a team of 5 players and not just 1. current and past models do not provide an environment with sufficient movement to maintain the sports spirit of the players.
my suggestion is that the developer work on a horizontal and vertical system, reducing the margin ranges of mmr points needed to move up and down rank in "Level, lower skill ranges", creating competition moves.
in another vision all the V IV III II I copper bands would become a rank containing bronze silver gold ceasing to exist those V IV III II I, becoming a competition where the player to reach the maximum mmr changes of "Range Level" and the system to prevent smurf cheats bothering lower level players would prevent them from returning to LOWER LEVEL tracks, the loss of mmr would only take them back to the beginning of the level range with the increase of a visual bonus of marking on the insignia.



Another request for improvements in relation to gameplay health would be the creation of a pre-selection of agents by the team members in order to avoid theft of "annoying" agents, allowing the player to be able to play with the pre-selected operators. where the 5 team members would never have the same agents available, based on a pre-selection prior to each start of the match where the match organizer avoids placing players with conflicting operators. It's been more than 4 seasons without being able to play with certain ops.

zero tolerance for hs relay. in the same way that the offender receives the friendly fire mark, the victim should receive an invisible mark, and the recurrence of hs on the same victim, even if by a different player without the friendly fire mark active, should receive the good old kick, and or give the victim player the option to leave the game.

toxic players certainly exploit the flaw of this suggestion however, but you can't leave a player trapped in this situation. the player must have an unpunished exit for abandoning extremely toxic matches.

casual match conditions. seriously, putting a player in a game in progress, it does the same scheme as the ranks without entry of other games that started with certain members and ends with the same and/or the same absent ones, putting players in games in progress and procreating toxicity.

"One tap" is extremely threatening for players, but it is somewhat unreasonable for operators in different armors to be the same, which is very unfair to operators with level three armor, they have very slow movement speed and very large steps, which greatly limit their performance in the game, but may only take one more bullet than other armor, and the presence of One tap may not give them the advantage of high armor they should have. Therefore, operators of different armors should have different damage when headshots, such as 4x damage for Level 1 armor, 3x damage for Level 2 armor, and 2x damage for Level 3 armor. Or other suitable multipliers, so that the advantages of third-level armor are reflected, and second-level armor is the same.

The shield changes are very exciting, but these changes are good for MONTAGNE and CLASH, but not for BLITZ, for BLITZ, he is a breakthrough operator, he needs to effectively kill the enemy, if the shield to kill the enemy is very bad for him, he has lost a way to effectively get the kill. Therefore, if you change the waist shot to push down, the "V" key can still kill the enemy, and the "B" key is changed to free view, is it more reasonable?

Bonjour à tous,
Je m'adresse surtout aux développeurs de Rainbow six siège et aux levels designers car j'ai une requête spéciale a vous demander qui est la suivante : Es ce que vous pouvez ajouter un chat porte bonheur sur une plaque sur laquelle est inscrit Lyana dans la carte gratte ciel s'il vous plaît car j'ai du mal a accepter le décès de mon chat et j'aimerais lui rendre hommage sur un jeu auquel je joue souvent pour m'en rappeler.
Merci d'avoir lu mon post sur ce forum et de votre compréhension.
Au revoir Bossma40.

As currently we are at heavy console controls support I want to point out issue that prevents me from playing or gives hard time playing "controlled gadget" operators operators. As a support player i would love to be able to use as much gadgets as possible instead of my gun (;

Operators affected: Twitch, Maestro, Echo, Valkyrie, Zero, Brava, Booletproof camera
Issue: Aiming with gadget is hard (almost impossible) when playing on high sensitivity
Reprosteps:

"Fast turning, precise aiming" - "NoADS, ADS rule" Both of them have separate sensitivity setting giving players possibility to setup own preference, suiting their own needs. Problem is that this rule do not apply to anything outside of "operator". If player posses something that is not operator (any gadget, camera, drone) there is no "ADS" state. This mean "NoADS" sensitivity is used as default and only setting leaving player with too high sensitivity to perform precise actions.
ADS for gadgets - "Simplest" (ofc for end user to understand, implementation wise it wont 🙂 ) solution is to be consistent with NoADS, ADS rule in every context player can be in (operator, gadget). Sounds easy right? Ofc it is not. Aside from work that has to be done on implementation side, player need to understand in what state player is.

Feedback base line:
Operator state is clear to be sold
NoADS - Input not held (aim button), weapon is down, camera is not zoomed in.
ADS - Input held (aim button), weapon is up, camera uses "sights zoom"
Side note: this rule applies to every gadget that is held in operator hands. Lets make game more consistent!

Gadget state is tricky. Lets describe base line that can be used for everything first, and solve some tricky cases later.
Every gadget:
NoADS - Input not held (aim button)
ADS - Input held (aim button)
What do we miss? visual feedback. For operators weapon itself /zoom in FoV is a visual cue. For gadgets? there is no such thing. And we cannot do big and noticeable zoom in as it is player preference to have it or not (following weapon sights design). There still should be small zoom in just to create motion on screen.
To give player visual feedback we can use UI elements. Special frame or crosshair change to indicate "ADS" state.
This leaves us with:
NoADS - Input not held (aim button), camera is not zoomed in, default crosshair/ui element
ADS - Input held (aim button), camera uses "slight zoom", special state of crosshair/ui element

Sounds cool right? But there has to be cornercase:
Maestro: ADS input is the same as "open bulletproof glass" input. What if player want to ping enemy gadget or precise position with yellow ping without opening glass?
What is risky to do:
Create more complicate input - ADS button do not open glass but player can open/close glass with another input. Aiming - thumbstick + Aim button - ADS state + additional button - open glass + fire button - fire. 4 inputs sounds not like much but there are scenarios player will push all of them at the same time. Unless change for opening glass will be a toggle instead of hold. With toggle player commits to camera state by planning next move.
Fire button opens up glass before shooting - change to whole gadget gameplay flow. Maestro flick shooting is a thing: player may want to keep glass open while turning away from target to block shoots with camera body. With this approach player is forced to shoot at ceiling with open glass or close glass making next shooting delayed (maybe it is not a bad thing (; )

I wonder if there could be a chance to vote to invalidate tk punishment before start a match when playing with other 4 friends.

Over the years, the franchises of Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell and Hideo Kojima's Metal Gear have been poking fun at each other; with each game sequel occassionally making a reference to one another as a playful gag.

MGS2: Sons of Liberty featured Solid Snake using tri-focal goggles for a moment and MGS3: Snake Eater decided to have Naked Snake complain and state "Why not send in Sam or Adam for this mission?"
(Sam being a reference to Sam Fisher of Splinter Cell while Adam is a reference to Deus Ex)

Meanwhile Splinter Cell would toss in a joke in Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory about how you aquire pickups in the Metal Gear games and in Ghost Recon: Wildlands we saw Sam have a somber moment after realizing that Metal Gear's franchise was finished; AKA, hearing that Snake retired.

I for one think that this invites an opporitunity.
What with all the rumors of possibly another remake of Metal Gear Solid being considered by Konami, perhaps Ubisoft can make a crossover deal with the studio?

The crossover being that in Metal Gear Solid Remastered, if that game is even a thing, there is a bonus optional mission in which Solid Snake can rescue Sam Fisher (callsign "Shadow Fish") as an optional cameo appearance as the two work to get Sam to an exfil point and then Snake continues his operation.

Meanwhile if Ubisoft gets their supposed Splinter Cell: Omega Protocol game going again, Snake can make a cameo in that game as well.

OR

Perhaps we can have another Crossover Elite Set wherein Sam "ZERO" Fisher will take on the likeness and appearance of David "Solid Snake" as he appeared in Metal Gear Solid.
The Elite MVP Animation would easily be ZERO approaching off-screen, trying to be stealthy. Suddenly he notices the player watching him through the screen, giving us the iconic MGS Alert sound and exclamation mark over his head and a pop-up in the corner revealing that an alert is active. ZERO then deploys a smoke grenade that quickly dissipates, revealing the equally iconic Box of Oranges sitting there.

Whaddya think?

Should ZERO adopt the appearance and attire of Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes?
Call the bundle "OPERATION TWIN SNAKE"
The Headgear would be "Kept You Waiting?"
The Uniform would be "FoxHound Wetwork"



Or perhaps his appearance in Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty?
Call the bundle "OPERATION BIG SHELL"
The Headgear would be "Iroquois Pliskin"
The Uniform would be "Philathropist"



Or perhaps his appearance as "Old Snake" in Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots?
Call the bundle "OPERATION PATR10T"
The Headgear would be "Solid Eye"
The Uniform would be "Old Snake"



Or perhaps we should go with his outfit and attire from Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater and go with the chronologically original depiction of Jack "Naked Snake" / "Big Boss"?
Call the bundle "VIRTUOUS MISSION"
The Headgear would be "Big Boss"
The Uniform would be "Snake Eater"

hello / good evening 👋 I'm coming back to you to see if it will be possible to add to the menu below the matches that we were able to make our victory ✅ or our defeat ❌ to make it clearer and see if we were able to do more victories than defeats or vice versa I was able to create a small overview to help you understand me better thank you for your answer and see you soon good day or good evening to you! 😜

The BLACKBEARD skill is awkward in the game. Until now, the changes to his skills have not satisfied the player, mainly because the gun shield has a good gain when shooting at enemies, but this powerful skill debuff is in movement, which has a certain impact on the gun shield, but does not change the operator's income when shooting at enemies. Perhaps the debuff given to him in the skill will balance his strength, such as thickening his shield to the right health so that his shield can withstand higher damage, but an enemy hitting the shield will cause him to be unable to accurately aim at the enemy, and may even be killed by breaking the shield due to the shield's low health. Allowing his shield to be hit will make it impossible to aim at the enemy, which may be an effective means for defenders to counter him.